Introduction — The Calm Before the Next Tech Storm
Every decade has its turning point.
The 1980s brought personal computing.
The 1990s delivered the internet.
The 2000s were ruled by Google and social media.
The 2010s belonged to smartphones and cloud.
Now, the 2020s are shaping up to be the decade of AI — a decade that will decide which companies still matter in 2035 and which become business-school case studies on missed opportunities.
But this time, the winners won’t be the companies that invent the next big thing.
They’ll be the companies that integrate AI into everything — cloud, code, hardware, and everyday life — while still making money doing it.
Here’s how the leaderboard looks today… and how I believe it will look a decade from now.
1. Microsoft — The Enterprise AI Standard
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | Dominant in enterprise software, Azure cloud, and AI integration (Copilot, Office 365, GitHub). |
| 2035 Role | “AI Infrastructure of the Professional World” — seamlessly blending productivity, automation, and cloud. |
| Strategic Moat | Integration. Microsoft owns the tools people already use to work. AI just makes them indispensable. |
| Risks | Antitrust regulation, cultural complacency, over-reliance on enterprise clients. |
Outlook: Microsoft has reinvented itself more effectively than any company in modern tech history. Unless another paradigm shift catches it off guard, it remains the most likely global tech leader in 2035.
2. NVIDIA — The Infrastructure Backbone
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | AI chip and GPU dominance; CUDA software ecosystem; networking hardware leadership. |
| 2035 Role | “The Electric Company of AI” — powering global compute infrastructure for every model and agent. |
| Strategic Moat | Hardware + Software vertical integration and developer ecosystem lock-in. |
| Risks | Hardware cyclicality, geopolitical supply constraints (Taiwan), hyperscaler competition. |
Outlook: NVIDIA is the new Intel — but faster, hungrier, and better integrated. Its next 10 years are about scaling the global compute grid that AI runs on.
3. Google (Alphabet) — The AI Information Fabric
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | Search, Ads, YouTube, Android, Cloud, Gemini AI. |
| 2035 Role | “Information Fabric” — connecting users, creators, and AI through multimodal interfaces. |
| Strategic Moat | Data dominance and AI research leadership (DeepMind, Gemini). |
| Risks | Ad-revenue dependency, antitrust issues, internal execution risk. |
Outlook: Google will likely remain one of the “Big Three” AI ecosystems, evolving from a search company into an AI-driven operating layer for the world’s information.
4. Amazon (AWS) — The Dual-Engine Giant
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | AWS cloud infrastructure; retail and logistics empire; growing AI toolset. |
| 2035 Role | “The Cloud Powerhouse” — serving global AI workloads while monetizing its retail and advertising ecosystem. |
| Strategic Moat | Scale, logistics, data, and cloud integration. |
| Risks | Retail margin drag; slower innovation in AI platforms; regulatory challenges. |
Outlook: AWS remains Amazon’s engine of profit and influence. If it grows from 17% to 35–40% of total revenue, Amazon could challenge the top three.
5. Apple — The Experience Architect
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | Dominant in consumer hardware and services; strong ecosystem loyalty. |
| 2035 Role | “Invisible AI” — seamlessly blending AI into devices and experiences (Vision Pro, Siri+, health). |
| Strategic Moat | Design excellence, ecosystem stickiness, privacy brand. |
| Risks | Innovation slowdown; dependency on hardware cycles; global regulation. |
Outlook: Apple’s future success depends on how elegantly it hides AI inside its products — not how loudly it markets it.
6. OpenAI — The AI Platform Layer
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | Creator of GPT models; largest user base in AI tools; strong brand and developer traction. |
| 2035 Role | “The API of Intelligence” — powering the world’s digital assistants, copilots, and autonomous agents. |
| Strategic Moat | Brand dominance, first-mover advantage, and Microsoft partnership. |
| Risks | Massive compute costs; profitability challenges; infrastructure dependency. |
Outlook: OpenAI could become the “Adobe + Intel Inside” of the AI age — providing intelligence infrastructure even if others own the datacenter.
7. Anthropic — The Ethical AI Partner
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | Rapidly growing AI company; strong enterprise adoption; “Constitutional AI” framework. |
| 2035 Role | “Trusted Enterprise AI” — powering regulated industries with safe, explainable models. |
| Strategic Moat | Trust, transparency, and governance. |
| Risks | Smaller scale; compute dependency; slower ecosystem growth. |
Outlook: Anthropic could become the “Volvo of AI” — not always fastest, but safest, most reliable, and most trusted.
8. Meta (Facebook) — The Attention Engine
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | Global social dominance; large AI infrastructure; investment in AR/VR and metaverse. |
| 2035 Role | “The Human Interface Company” — owning the spaces where humans and AI interact. |
| Strategic Moat | Data, reach, advertising infrastructure, and social graph. |
| Risks | Privacy backlash, regulation, uncertain metaverse ROI. |
Outlook: Meta’s influence may rise or fall based on how immersive computing evolves — but its grip on attention keeps it relevant.
9. AMD — The Challenger Innovator
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Strength | High-performance chips, strong R&D, competitive pricing vs NVIDIA. |
| 2035 Role | “Agile Hardware Challenger” — capturing market share in AI, edge, and specialized chips. |
| Strategic Moat | Cost efficiency and rapid product cycles. |
| Risks | Thin margins, smaller ecosystem, dependency on manufacturing partners. |
Outlook: AMD won’t overtake NVIDIA, but it will ensure the AI hardware market never becomes a monopoly.
10. The Survivors Club — Oracle, IBM, Intel
| Company | 2035 Role | Strength | Risks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | Niche AI infrastructure + enterprise cloud | Deep enterprise base | Heavy debt, limited innovation |
| IBM | Quantum computing and consulting | Early quantum leadership | Long commercialization cycles |
| Intel | Foundry + edge compute | Manufacturing capacity | Missed GPU wave, execution risk |
Outlook: They’ll remain profitable and relevant — but they won’t lead. Their best days of defining the future are behind them.
Wild Cards and External Forces
| Factor | Impact by 2035 |
|---|---|
| Quantum Computing | Adds niche advantages (drug design, logistics), but not mass disruption yet. |
| Regulation & Geopolitics | AI sovereignty and energy costs could reshape market share faster than innovation. |
| New Entrants | Expect at least one new global AI infrastructure player (sovereign AI cloud, Asian entrant) to emerge. |
| Energy & Compute Constraints | Data centers may become the new oil fields — whoever controls power controls AI. |
My 2035 Power Ranking
| Rank | Company | Role |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft | The Enterprise AI Standard |
| 2 | NVIDIA | The Infrastructure Backbone |
| 3 | Google (Alphabet) | The AI Information Fabric |
| 4 | OpenAI | The AI Platform Layer |
| 5 | Amazon (AWS) | The Cloud Powerhouse |
| 6 | Apple | The Experience Architect |
| 7 | Anthropic | The Ethical AI Partner |
| 8 | Meta | The Attention Engine |
| 9 | AMD | The Challenger Innovator |
| 10 | Oracle / IBM / Intel | The Survivors Club |
Conclusion — The Next Decade Belongs to Integrators, Not Innovators
The next 10 years won’t reward whoever has the flashiest AI demo.
It will reward those who integrate — who combine compute, software, and human workflows into systems that quietly just work.
AI isn’t the disruptor anymore. It’s the infrastructure layer of everything.
And by 2035, we’ll know which companies built foundations — and which built castles on sand.
Author’s Notes
- This article isn’t about predicting winners for stock charts — it’s about understanding why certain companies rise while others fade.
- Leadership in tech isn’t about size — it’s about momentum, integration, and the ability to see ten years ahead while building for tomorrow morning.
- This is the off week – where I get away from “AI and .NET good – everything else bad” narrative and tell you what I really think
Want More?
- Check out all of our free blog articles
- Check out all of our free infographics
- We currently have two books published
- Check out our hub for social media links to stay updated on what we publish
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn’t Tesla on this list?
Tesla is an AI company disguised as a car company, but its focus is narrow — mobility and robotics. It will likely be a key application layer, not an infrastructure leader.
Could OpenAI or Anthropic ever overtake Microsoft or Google?
Possible, but unlikely. They’re platforms that run on Microsoft and Google infrastructure. Unless they build their own compute layer, they’ll remain powerful but dependent.
What about Chinese tech giants like Tencent or Baidu?
They’ll dominate in China and parts of Asia, but geopolitical divides and AI sovereignty laws will keep them semi-walled off from Western markets.
Will quantum computing rewrite this list?
Not by 2035. It will matter deeply for certain industries, but not replace classical AI or cloud computing yet.
Is the AI market already saturated?
Not even close. We’re at the electricity-in-1900 stage — exciting, uneven, and just beginning to standardize.
What about startups?
History guarantees one or two dark horses. The next NVIDIA or OpenAI could be a small lab today with a world-changing breakthrough in 2028.